The Postmodern Proletariat Essay Example for Free

The Postmodern Proletariat EssayABSTRACTAlthough the landscape of the business world has changed dramatically, there is disagreement among scholars as to whether Marxs surmisal of derangement still applies to the current bring inplace environment. Although the advent of unions and teamsters conferences, employee stock options and ownership sharing plans, and job benefits seem to ameliorate working conditions thereby minimizing the constituteence of disaffection, some scholars believe that other foundings from capitalism such(prenominal) as globalization and development technology communications offset the balance gained from these improvements in outwear relations thereby further promulgating its effects. Using historical observation from the early years of capitalism in America, neighborly personal identity theory, and literature on in pee-peeation technology and corporate cultural diversity, a disparity emerges regarding how the mixer estrangement of minorities dif fers from that of non-minority members. A dialectical inquiry is made to determine how the autobiography of capital diligence in America is re previous(a)d to cordial disaffection based on a workers racial or cultural heritage.INTRODUCTION round scholars suggest that Marxian theory is antiquated and that due to advances in technology, the evolution of industry and the change in the way business is conducted, individuals in the workplace may incur less monomania than forwards. The evolution of organizational and employee developments such as the unions and teamsters meetings, employee stock options and ownership sharing plans, and job benefits may offer explanations as to why symptoms of alienation pass yet to birth a proletariat revolution as theorized by Marx. Additionally, socio-stinting safety nets established by legislation to save capitalism such as the creation of the nutriment wage, welf are, child grok laws, equal employment opportunity and affirmative do progra ms, and social security make up excessively assisted in the maintenance of capitalism thereby minimizing the impact alienation has on individuals in the workplace.However, for near minorities and women these developments that stimulate occurred throughout Ameri fundament history father d mavin little to ameliorate alienation because until approximately the last 30 40 years few take laws were designed with minorities in mind. As a matter of fact, even legislation designed to protect minorities and women is often challenging to en stick, allowing alienation to exist from factors including unequal employment opportunities, a lack of diversity in the workplace, and unequal pay in the midst of men and women or based on course. Research suggests that women and minorities on average still shop as little as among 75% 80% of white mens wages in paid take.Marx has been criticized for overlooking this stratum of alienation based on race and gender that illuminates a different fac e of capitalism. Marx proposed four dimensions of alienation that can be classified as self, social, product, and style of deed. The purpose of this paper is to demonstrate how alienation occurs in different ways overlooked in the literature by redefining the worker through the lens of social identity theory which may justify how alienation is a relative concept. Questions will be addressed such as which workers may experience relative alienation? What other forms of alienation exist and to whom may it apply? And how can the new proletariat be effectively managed in efforts to reduce anxiety as a result of social or cultural dissonance?Following a brief literature review of Marxian theory, social identity theory, and literature on information technology, I will control how the expansion of capitalism has spawned a modern more diverse proletariat that still experiences alienation, notwithstanding in varying degrees that differ from non-minority workers. This paper will theoretic ally demonstrate how age affects the social alienation of minorities in a manner different than non-minority members resulting in a dialectical inquiry of how the history of capital tote in America is related to social alienation.LITERATURE REVIEWThe link between capitalism and labour partyThroughout the history of the world, it is labor power which has heroic any so called civilized nine. According to Marx, before the emergence of capitalism, society was more communal and each person in society contributed his/her own labor where it was needed and in the way best suited for his or herself (Marx Engels, 1951). For example, there were blacksmiths, hunters, fisherman etc. and each bartered and traded with iodine another for their sustenance. Approximately 2,000 years before the dawn of capitalism false needs (those needs that the culture capital industry makes us to believe are real (Marcuse, 1964) did not exist isolated from necessary ones such as food and shelter. For almost all of human history people and communities grew, hunted, and traded for what they needed (Agger, 2004). The creation of money changed this, according to Marx (Marx Engels, 1951a), because it could be relieve and used for many purposes as it became an intermediary in the trading process. Instead of simply macrocosm used as a tool of economic value to bewilder necessary needs like basic food and shelter, money began to signify success or social status which gradually distanced individuals from one another (Agger, 2004), thusly the term alienation.Another type of labor Marx termed free labor (Marx Engels, 1951b), although the term free is a misnomer. This form of labor was one in which knuckle downs provided labor. They were bought and sold on with their labor power once to a slave owner thereby graceful a commodity such as a dishwasher or a tractor. It is important to note that the slave is the commodity so his labor power is no prolonged a commodity that belongs to him. Ma rxs account of history explains how the bourgeoisie capitalist emerged (Marx Engels, 1951a) but for the purposes of this paper I will fast forward to capitalism in colonial America which includes the most recognized form of labor that still exist today, wage labor.Although wage labor is labor that is at archetypical owned by the worker, it can be sold by the worker thereby making it so that the labor is no longer under the workers control. The worker receives means of subsistence in exchange for his labor power, but the capitalist receives in exchange for his means of subsistence labour, the productive activity of the worker, the creative power whereby the worker not only replaces what he consumes but gives to the hoard labour a greater value than it previously possessed.(Marx Engels, 1951b, pp85) This type of alliance between the worker and the capitalist along with the creation of currency creates what Marx termed as alienation (Giddens Held, 1982).Marxs theory of alienation Marx attributes four types of alienation to labor under capitalism (Giddens Held, 1982). According to Marx, when the worker gets paid for completing an assigned task, he is very selling his labor as a commodity. This commodity is a form of capital that Marx terms as having social power because the power is transferred from the proletariat or worker to the capitalist (Marx Engels, 1951b). Once this transfer of labor power occurs, alienation develops for many reasons as outlined by Marx (Giddens Held, 1982). The first includes the alienation of the worker from his or her true self as a human being rather than a machine due to the lack of opportunity for self expression and in a flash benefitting from the fruits of ones individual labor. The profit or commodity created as a result of ones labor is privately owned by someone other than the creator.The second form of alienation, social alienation, occurs between workers since capitalism reduces labor to a commodity to be traded on t he market and disrupts the social relationship among workers. Thirdly, since the product is controlled by the capitalist, alienation exists between the worker and the product itself. The worker no longer has control of his own life because he no longer has any control of his own work. Before the emergence of capitalism, labor was a persons life activity. According to Marx a worker never rick autonomous or experience self-realization because their life activity or work becomes controlled by someone else.The manifestation of their life through the fruits of their labor is no longer realized by the worker herself. Now their labor is only significant in the way the bourgeois want it. Lastly, alienation exists from the act of production itself due to high specialization and the socio-economic class of labor (Smith, 1991) among workers that results in high efficiency for the capitalist but becomes a meaningless activity, offering little infixed satisfaction for the worker. Marx also no ted that religion strengthens the alienation process by causing individuals to accept their lot in life no matter its condition. neighborly identity theoryTajfel (1978) defines social identity as that part of an individuals self-concept which derives from his knowledge of his membership of a social group (or groups) together with the value and emotional significance attached to that membership.(pp. 63). Tajfel and Turner (1979) further described social categorization as one of three processes that underlie social identity theory ( bait). brotherly categorization is the process by which individuals categorize others into groups in efforts to organize social information (Ellemers, De Gilder, Haslam, 2004 Tajfel, 1978). According to Tajfel (1978), social categorization is the underlying process of perplex that is sufficient as well as necessary to induce forms of in-group favoritism and out- group discrimination. The second process, social comparison, occurs when people make compari sons between the self sensed categories of groups in relation to the groups sensed values and their own individual values (Tajfel, 1978). Social identification, the final process, allows people define themselves based on their level of affiliation with a group that they believe shares the same values they wish to attain.The choice of group affiliation is also based on the perceived value that the group holds in expectation of receiving portionl benefit from such membership (Ashforth Mael, 1989). Ashforth and Mael (1989) also note that this categorization process serves the purposes of (a) helping people make sense of their environment by defining other in relation to their group membership, and (b) enabling individuals to define themselves in comparison to other groups. People are then more likely to identify with a group with whom they share similarities, because their identification is based on how they categorize themselves as similar to those within the group (van Knippenberg van Schie, 2000). Turner (1978) demonstrated in various experiments where groups were created with minimal categorization, when there is no category placed on them, participants artificially created in- groups and out- group dynamics.This showed evidence that individuals in groups will create artificial divisions between themselves and individuals from other groups even when no observable differences are striking. Other experiments demonstrated that since race is a very salient characteristic, its social categorization may induce in-group favoritism and out-group discrimination as well. One such example of how inter-group bias is resolved through an understanding of SIT is taken from what is known as the Robbers Cave study in which two groups of boys campers were placed on two different sides of the campgrounds unaware one another (Gaertner, Dovidio, Banker, Houlette, Johnson, McGlynn, 2000).Upon each groups awareness of each other, they immediately began to discriminate once ag ainst each other for no salient reason other than the fact that they were in different groups. This resulted in each group creating an in-group and out-group condition. However, using decategorization, conflict between the two groups was ameliorated (Gaertner, Dovidio, Banker, Houlette, Johnson, McGlynn, 2000). Decategorization is the process by which individuals in groups are isolated from their group and placed in a situation in which they must interact with a member from another group they deem as the out-group. Over time, cake level differences erode and deep level similarities emerge which helps them to decategorize themselves in relation to their group membership. Isolation from the influence of their group members enables this decategorization to occur, thereby reducing conflict between the members from different groups. The contemporary workplaceManaging diversity. Some diversity scholars suggest that a demographically representative workforce results in more innovation and creativity (Jackson, 1991 Cox Blake, 1991). on that point has been an increased recognition of the need for more diversity as it is not only ethical, but is also good for business. A diverse workforce assists companies in attracting customers by having sales teams that speak the language of the minority consumer. Marketing and promotion becomes more effective because a company with a diverse workforce has a greater understanding of the culture and values of its consumers helping them to connect with them.Overall, this paradigm shift in the hiring practices of current companies occurs as it heavily impacts their bottom line in a profitable manner. This new shift is very evident as the backlash from majority group members such as White males mounts. Protests against affirmative action programs and blaming minorities for economic crises such as job layoffs, falling real incomes, and diminished access to quality education have resulted in racial profiling and detest crimes (Agger, 2 002), other ways to alienate minority members.Information communication technology (ICT). Communication via technologies has been shown to change group interaction. It tends to equalize participation, because group members participate more equally, and magnetic or higher status members may have less power (Kiesler, Siegel, McGuire, 1984). Social psychological aspects of computer- mediated communications studies of groups that make decisions via computer interaction have shown they were more uninhibited and there was less influence from any one dominant person.It appears that groups that communicate by computer experience a breakdown of social and organizational barriers. This may occur because we as individuals can recreate ourselves forming a new identity, a cyber self (Agger, 2004). The cyber self is described by Agger as the self-assembled, manipulated persona that accesses the world via online. According to Agger, a capitalist system thrives off consumer self-invention as we cr eate status and false needs for ourselves. In a cyber-capitalism (Agger, 2004) this still occurs but with ones true identity hidden. This may be beneficial for minorities who still may become socially alienated even after reinventing themselves. divinatory DEVELOPMENTKarl Marx said the history of all hitherto-existing society is the history of class struggles (Marx Engels, 1951a). Although many scholars acknowledge overlaps between class and race, I believe the salience of racial color and distinct racial features helps to further explain dynamics regarding the relationship between the proletariat and the bourgeoisie and its effect on promulgating capitalism and alienation. As we have observed, the history of social economic systems depicts changes in how labor was utilized. Consequently, it may also demonstrate the extent of alienation exhibited by workers. The majority of the first settlers and later most immigrants of European ancestry up until present day experienced alienation as theorized by Marx. But unlike the worker who sold his labor as the commodity, the slave laborer was the commodity, providing free labor while the worker or the serf earned a wage.Although Marx does make the distinction between wage labor and slave labor to some degree (Marx Engels, 1951b), he does not delve into the consequences or the degree of the difference between the two regarding the consequences of alienation. According to Marx, the capitalist society leads to the alienation of workers by not allowing them to express themselves through their work. The proletariat is alienated because she is compensated less for her labor versus profiting from her own entrepreneurial efforts. Smith argued that this arrangement is moderately because the capitalist assumes the risk (Smith, 1991). This debate may be arguable for the average laborer at that period in history, but can this same lean of fairness hold true for the slave laborer? Although Marx spoke about alienation among worki ng class, he failed to detail the condition of the slaves at the time who one could argue were the most alienated.At best, Marx related that the Negro slave is a commodity only if used as one, such as a fix machine or any other commodity (Marx Engels, 1951b). In macrocosm SIT demonstrates how the saliency of race attaches a stigma to the slave as being only a slave, with skin color serving as an identifier. The result is that not only was the labor of a slave a commodity, but the slave itself was the commodity who could not profit from his/her own labor. This is the first example of how alienation differs between minorities and other workers. A dialectic exists because although alienation exist for all workers, it is greater for minorities, ergo the slaves, due to social injustice. This oversight in Marxian theory is important to recognize as it may mean that levels of strength of alienation should be identified.Ironically, capitalism, the economic force that initially promulgate d slavery, became the economic force that would ameliorate the condition of alienation among minorities in a dialectical sense. According to Marx, the mass of wage labor grows as the capital grows (Marx Engels, 1951b). In his words, the number of wage workers grows the domination of capital extends over a greater number of individuals, (Marx Engels, 1951b, pp 87). When four million Blacks were released from slavery in 1865 (Bennet, 1984), they were forced to compete with White laborers which created a troubled situation. However, Northerners looked south for cheap labor and imported Blacks to beat down a higher standard living or to break up unions (Meltzer, 1984). It was capitalism at its finest which served to create an opportunity for ex-slaves. Although they experienced more alienation than their White counterparts because they were not allowed to unionize, being in a situation where they could actually work for a wage could be considered a step up from their past condition of slavery and poverty.The industrial revolution of the late 18th and early 19th century provides additional examples of how not only the need for labor increased, but how this need created token labor for minorities who ordinarily would have faced discrimination and not found work. The transcontinental railroad project is considered by some to be one of the most important projects in American history because it enabled Americans to connect across the entire U.S. An enormous undertaking, the Central Pacific Railroad, was so large and dangerous that there was a greater than usual pack for labor that minorities were able to fill (Schama, 2009). This important endeavor would not have been completed had it not been for the Chinese immigrants at that time. They were not wanted by the contractors at first, and were mistakenly considered too frail and effeminate for the job due to their small body frame and minimal facial hair. However, due to the need for more workers, they temporarily ove rcame prejudice and eventually comprised a significant amount of its workforce until its completion.Positing from Marx, dimensions of alienation existed due to the level of dangerous working conditions and the mind numbing and repetitive division of labor. At the completion of the project, the Chinese were not even recognized for their outstanding accomplishment. However, I argue that they experienced a decrease in the level of social alienation they would experience by having an opportunity to work alongside other Americans at a time when prejudice against them was volatile. Again, the dialectic occurs whereas Marxs theory of alienation applies to the work situation, but the fact that a job existed at all for the Chinese in a prejudiced society demonstrated the amelioration of alienation for minorities through capitalism. However, when observed as a comparison between minority and non-minority workers I propose that the level of alienation for minorities is still high as compared t o non-minorities. This may demonstrate how alienation could possibly be moderated by the race of a worker. Both examples from history provide evidence for what could be termed as relative alienation. spell Smith assumed that saving money and having a Protestant work ethic of self denial, working hard and delaying gratification was a driving force behind capitalism (Smith, 1991). He was correct in that it supported and helped to ignite its birth in America, but by the end of World War II people needed to spend money in order for capitalism to thrive (Agger, 2002). As a result people began to spend beyond their means and credit was popularized as a new way of spending. Eventually this new dimension of consumerism led to the Great Depression of 1929. As a result, a soldiery of programs were introduced by President Franklin Roosevelt to salvage the economy and the capitalistic way of life. Many new measures were devised by the Roosevelt administration to combat the Depression.The work week was shortened, young children were forbid to work, a minimum wage was set, and federal relief programs including social security were implemented. A public works program built new hospitals, schools and community centers, and playgrounds which created millions of jobs (Meltzer, 1984). It was not until these frantic years of the New Deal, as it was called, that Blacks began to move into unions as well as begin to truly benefit greatly from the creation of new jobs. Although discriminated against, minorities again experienced a different level of social alienation in the workplace, as compared to their White counterparts (Meltzer, 1984). Henry Ford is noted for his revolutionary business homunculus using the assembly line as well as for increasing the wages of his workers so that they may purchase his vehicles.The Ford Model T was the first automobile mass produced on assembly lines with completely interchangeable parts, marketed to the middle class. The needed factory worker kn owledge and skills were also reduced to one of 84 areas. Although according to Marx this scenario serves as a situation for alienation to exist, for the minority worker it may be considered an elevation in social status in a foreign land in which they experience prejudice. It is noted that approximately 75% of Fords workforce were immigrants (Schama, 2009). Unfortunately, this was not due to Fords mildness for minorities in need of work, but rather for the need to meet the demands of labor. This demand continued during World War I and through World War II as men serving their country as soldiers were unavailable to meet the labor needs of capitalism.Minorities stepping in, although alienated by the exploitation of their labor, experienced an improvement in social alienation from White co-workers simply by having an opportunity to work with them. The birth of information communication technology has transformed the landscape of business and work group interaction. Its effect of remo ving barriers and equalizing members within interacting groups helps to ameliorate conditions of alienation of minorities with co-workers. The cyber self can be used to better connect with members from all cultural backgrounds.First, it is a self- assembled invention of the self that allows minorities get a foot in the door thereby enabling them to connect with co-workers in manner that blinds them from bias or prejudice. Secondly, computer-mediated interaction between members equalizes participation by removing the influence from dominant personalities or members. This is akin to a decategorization process by which majority members and minority members may converse via ICT without influence from ethnic, racial, or gender group member affiliation. I propose that this will enable deep-level characteristic to emerge while surface-level difference dissolve, enhancing the interaction between members. As a result, the probability of alienation occurring between co-workers may diminish in the contemporary workplace.CONCLUSIONThe sonnet inscribed on the Statue of Liberty readsGive me your tired, your poor,Your huddled crowd together yearning to breathe free,The wretched refuse of your teeming shore.Send these, the homeless, tempest-tossed to me.I lift my lamp beside the golden door.These words convey an offering of liberty and successfulness by capitalism and democracy that can be perceived as sincere. The history of capital demonstrates that the mantra of Lady Liberty may have in reality been a call for cheap labor to perpetuate capital and grow the U.S. economy. In turn, the rise of industry with an influx of immigrants created more than just a warming pot, but also bred a new type of worker different from the proletariat described by Marx. By deconstructing this new proletariat, we find that over time alienation in the workplace has manifested itself in a disguised manner for all Americans, but simultaneously improved co-worker interaction for minorities as a re sult of contemporary business practices. Recognizing this dialectic, the construct of alienation should be examined further in order to identify its different dimensions relative to the cultural and racial identity of workers.Additionally, managers and leaders should continue to foster business diversity practices that serve to be inclusive of all so as to minimize cultural or social dissonance among co-workers. Although capitalism has been attributed a major cause of alienation, it is ironic that the contemporary ways of doing business spawned from capitalistic expansion may save capitalism from becoming a socially dominant force that transgresses the basic rights of humanity. The new ways that businesses communicate and produce services and products at may seem to only change workplace social alienation at first glance. Ideologies created by capitalism such as globalization, just-in-time production, and the culture industry seem to have heightened alienation among workers in our wealth building society. However, so long as other ideologies of capitalism such as managing diversity for profit and ITC also exist, social alienation can be manageable.REFERENCESAgger, Ben. 1989. Fast Capitalism A Critical Theory of Significance. Urbana University of Illinois Press.Agger, Ben. 2002. Postponing the Postmodern Sociological Practices, Selves and Theories. Boulder, CO Rowman and Littlefield.Agger, Ben. 2004. The Virtual Self A Contemporary Sociology. United body politic Blackwell Publishing.Ashforth, B., Mael, F. 1989. Social identity and the organization. Academy of Management Review, 14 20 39.Bennet, Jr., Lerone. 1984. Before the Mayflower. New York Penguin Books.Cox, T. H. Blake, S. 1991. Managing Cultural Diversity Implications for organizational Competitiveness. Academy of Management Executive, 5 45-56.Gaertner, S.L., Dovidio, J.F., Banker, B.S., Houlette, M., Johnson, K.M., McGlynn, E.A. 2000. lessen intergroup conflict From super-ordinate goals to decateg orization, recategorization, and mutual differentiation. Group Dynamic Theory, Research, and Practice, 4 98-114.Giddens, A. and D. Held. 1982. Classes, Power, and Conflict Classical and Contemporary Debates. Berkeley, CA University of calcium Press.Jackson, S. E. 1991. Team composition in organizational settings Issues in managing an increasingly diverse workforce. In S. Worchel W. Wood, and J.Simpson (Eds.). Group Process and Productivity 138-173. Beverly Hills, CA Sage.Kiesler, S., Siegel, J., and McGuire, T.W. 1984. Social psychological aspects of computer- mediated communications. American Psychologist, 39 1123-1134.Knippenberg, D., Schie, E.C.M. 2000. Foci correlates of OID. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 73 137- 147.Mael, F., Ashforth, B. 2001. Identification in work, sports, and religionContrasting the benefits and risks. Journal for the Theory of Social Behavior, 31 197- 222.Mael, F.A., Tetrick, L.E. 1992. Identifying OID. Educational and Psychologica l Measurement, 52 813- 824.Marcuse, Herbert. 1964. One-Dimensional Man. Boston lighthouse Press.Marx, Karl. 1939. Capital Volume 1. New York International Publishers.Marx, K., and F. Engels. 1951. Selected Works in Two Volumes Volume 1. Moscow Foreign Languages Publishing House.Meltzer, Milton. 1984. The Black Americans A History in Their Own Words. New York Harper Collins Publishers.Schama, S.(Writer). (2009, January 20). What is an American? Television series episode. In The American Future A History. KERA.Smith, Adam. 1991. Wealth of Nations. Amherst, NY Prometheus Books.Tajfel, H., Turner, J. C. 1979. An integrative theory of intergroup conflict. In W. G.capital of Texas S. Worchel (Eds.), The social psychology of intergroup relations (pp. 3348).Monterey, CA Brooks/Cole.Tajfel, H. 1978. Differentiation between social groups Studies in the social psychology of intergroup relations. London Academic Press.Tajfel, H. 1974. Social identity and intergroup behavior. Social Science I nformation, 15 1010- 118.Note Marx and Engels 1951a refers to The Manifesto of the Communist Party by Karl Marx and Frederick Engels, and Marx and Engels 1951b refers to Wage Labour and Capital by Karl Marx as reprinted in Marx, K., and F. Engels. 1951. Selected Works in Two Volumes Volume 1. Moscow Foreign Languages Publishing House, pp. 21-97.Note Giddens Held 1982 refers the Economic and Philosophic Manuscripts reprinted in Giddens, A. and D. Held, Classes, Power, and Conflict Classical and Contemporary Debates, Berkeley, University of California Press, 1982, pp. 12-19.