The Psychological Effects of Gender Roles Essay -- Gender Roles Equali

The Psychological Effects of Gender Roles Let the boys be boys. Youve heard this say before. Often repeated by parents regarding their little boys. So what pass waters a boy, a boy? Rambo comparable characteristics? Muscles? Short hair? Wearing blue-blooded? Wearing T-shirts and jeans or playing with sporting equipment? Well last I remember, the main characteristics boys shared were penises. The role gender association play in the lives of our children dirty dog sometimes put on them negatively. The messages that gender roles send, is that in order to be part of society, you must fit into the norm or the status quo or most importantly what societydeems as acceptable. But all the while, trying to incorporate individuality and establishing ones sense of self. Two conflicting ideas that lavatory confuse a child and also alter the elbow room they live their lives.There are two colors that are designated to babies that serve one purpose and one purpose only. Most infant boys w ere the color blue and girls wear pink. Seeing that it is difficult to determine the sex of an infant without general exposure to the genitals, most parents choose to clothe theyre young child in the respective colors so people will know whether it is a boy or a girl. After all, what male infant wears pink? When the children capture older, do they still continue the practice the color identification game? This is wear it changes. When boys reach the age wear they start dressing themselves and start buying their own clothes, they will continue to wear theblues and the greens and even yellows and reds, but not pink or violet, cause those are girly colors. Girls on the other(a) hand, when they reach the same age still continue to wear the pink and violets and can even wear the blues, yellows, blacks, and greens. So why can girls make the cross-over without world teased or mocked but boys cant without being called a gay or a fagot. The clothing issue goes farther than that. The f ashion industry does make boundaries with clothing. There is womens clothing and mens clothing. Women can wear mens clothing, and at times its the stylish thing to do. Young girls can dress like boys or wear boys clothing and at times will only be called a tom-boy, but that is acceptable to society. Lets see a man in public wearing a dress, and we stop and go out of our expressive style to break our necks just so we can get a good look.... ...d am able to observe what is going on and what can happen. Im am in no way implying that making your infant son wear blue is bad and if he wears pink as he gets older, it your fault. I know that I probably wouldnt be to happy about the fact that my little boy is wearing pink either, but its how you approach and deal with the situation the can have an ready on your child. Many parents would probably tell their children this type of situation, Pink is for girls, take it off. What are you gay or something. Are you a sissy? Act like a boy. (Fin aut) It is brought upon so negatively and makes the child feel low and incompetent, especially if they are told this by their fathers. Not everyone will agree with my point of view and that is something I understand, but its all about being open-minded which is obviously not the message gender roles send. Works CitedFinaut, Jim. Personal Interview, 11, July 1999. Hales, Dianne. Invitation to Health Power of Prevention, eighth edition. atomic number 20 Brooks/Cole, 1990. Richards, Orland. Personal Interview, 13 July 1999. Tannen, Deborah. You Just Dont Understand Women and Men in Conversation. New York Ballantine, 1990.

The Songs of Experience - Explication of London Essay -- Blakes Londo

The Songs of Experience - Explication of London   William Blake published, in 1794, a collection of poems entitled The Songs of Experience. This collection whole caboodle in collaboration with an earlier collection of the authors poems called The Songs of Innocence. The practices of 1794 bring to the reader a more realistic or even pessimistic view of the authors indigenous England, in comparison to the poems in The Songs of Innocence. One of the works in the more realistic collection is simply titled London. In this work Blake gives a telegraphic critique of the city that shares its name with the title as the speaker moves among the suffering people of that city. The poem condemns the condition of the city and its people. Blake questions the economic structure, and the extent of the g all overnments control over the people in England. He goes on to challenge the church and its role in society. The poem concludes with a charge that the moral degradation of London is sexual climax into plain sight in the form of physically impaired children.   The first stanza of the work functions as a thesis. Here the author plays with the word Charterd (ln.1 & ln.2). The meanings alter in the dictionary, but all pertain to Blakes use of the word. Charterd is the condition of not only the streets of London but also of the citys greatest asset, the Thames River. While chartered world power mean liberated, in the tone of this work it more likely means rented out. In this way Blake challenges the economic system of his homeland. Also, in this double meaning, the reader tail end see irony in that the phrase might scoff at the idea of the people of England considering themselves liberated. The second half of the first stanza tells us ... ...ed by the harlot. another(prenominal) idea to consider is Blakes personal feelings about societal institutions. Above we asserted that societies rules could shackle a persons mind, so to keep with tha t idea we could assert that the marriage hearse whitethorn tell us how Blake personally feels about the institution of marriage.   This work is an open commentary on the situation of the city of London. Blake calls into question some of the basic practices of the citys people, and government. The work moves with the streets and calls to the readers attention the different ways in which the people suffer. It accuses the government of controlling the minds of people, and the exploitation of its soldiers. It accuses the church of neglecting the needy, and finally it accuses the people themselves of poisoning their own children through their immoral acts.  

Hang Up and Drive Essay -- Persuasive, social reform, Argumentative, c

Imagine my typical workday commute on a casual mid-morning. Ill be dressed and ready to take out the ten mile drive from Vancouver to Portland for work. As I turn the key and back tabu, I slam the brakes as a green late model Sienna almost T-bones me when Im clearly half-way out the street. I glare back, like any driver would, and see she is nonetheless talking on her phone making her way around me like I was a minor obstacle in her day. I drive out the neighborhood and make my way to the interstate. At the next intersection I get stuck at a light that just turns green while a kid, I can see the Class of 2010 writing all around the car, has their head down tapping a text message out and looks up subsequently I chirp my horn. By this time ive developed a touch of impatience thats working its way to road rage and its getting fueled by my commute that brings me across the Glen Jackson Bridge. Numerous times I see the triangle, which is the im on the phone multi-tasking and I forgot how to drive pose. I finally make it into work at my last wits. I start to walk in when I almost get mowed down by a fellow coworker. This is the conduct where I call in to work cause I need a mental health day. Everyone described is the sum product of the problem of cause while using a cell phone.This day was not a dramatization but more of a realization of a problem we sacrifice here in the Portland Metro Area. I feel on this short commute my anger was not directed at any certain demographic. in that location is no age, pay grade, religious affiliation associate with my rage. It is that my fellow commuters disregard their local laws while using their cell phone. My solution would be charge a cell phone user with a primary traffic infraction and implement current technol... ..., David, Frank Drews, and Dennis Couch. A Comparison of the Cell Phone number one wood and the Drunk Driver. A Comparison of the Cell Phone Driver and the Drunk Driver. University of Utah, 04 Mar. 2005 . Web. 28 Feb. 2010. . Repko, Melissa. Oregon Senate passes bill banning driving while using take hold cell phone Oregon Local News - OregonLive.com. Oregon Local News, Breaking News, Sports & Weather - OregonLive.com. The Oregonian, 23 June 2009. Web. 01 Mar. 2010. . Cell Phone Subscribers in the U.S., 19852008 Infoplease.com. Infoplease Encyclopedia, Almanac, Atlas, Biographies, Dictionary, Thesaurus. Free online reference, enquiry & homework help. Infoplease.com. Web. 01 Mar. 2010. .

Pedagogical Grammar Essay -- Education, Language Instructors

Introductionpedagogical grammar is a rather new concept that has been applied by a number of language instructors to commit new language knowledge to students (Nordquist 2011, p. 1). The teaching methodology has its own structures in the sense that it is divided into two aspects the first talks about the grammatic penning of language while the second talks about the articulation of language rules (of the new language). In comprehensively analyzing how the teaching methodology works, it is important to understand that when grammatical arrangement of words is to be done, the most appropriate arrangement of the words should be considered before the exercise. This approach is observed in the above sequence because pedagogical grammar has a definite, coherent and heuristic set of rules (Chalker 1994). These features should enable students to easily learn the second language through the development of an axiomatic system between L1 and L2 languages (Allwright 2009).Pedagogical grammar is however very unique in its purposes (especially regarding grammatical composition) because f...

Fourth Amendment Exceptions :: essays research papers

The Fourth Amendment to the Constitution states that people have the right to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against un valid searches and seizures, but the issue at hand hither is whether this also applies to the searches of open fields and of objects in plain view and whether the fourth amendment bequeaths protection over these as well. In order to reaffirm the courts decision on this matter I will be relating their decisions in the guinea pigs of Oliver v. United States (1984), and California v. Greenwood (1988) which deal directly with the question of whether a person can have reasonable expectations of privacy as provided for in the fourth amendment with regards to objects in an open field or in plain view. The differentiation between open fields and secluded property must be made before one can proceed to form an opinion regarding the constitutionality of a warrantless search of an open field. Oliver v. United States is a case in which police offic ers, acting on reports from neighbors that a speckle of marijuana was being cultivated on the Oliver farm, entered on to private property ignoring No Trespassing signs, and on to a secluded open portion of the Oliver property without a warrant, discovered the marijuana patch and then arrested Oliver without an arrest warrant. The Maine Judicial chat up held that No Trespassing signs posted around the Oliver property evinced a reasonable expectation of privacy, and therefore the court held that the open fields doctrine was not applicable to the Oliver case. Upon hearing the case, the Supreme Court argues that the special protections accorded by the fourth amendment do not extend to open fields. Open fields do not provide the setting for those intimate activities that the Amendment is intended to shelter from government interference or surveillance. The court refers to the case of Hester v. United States (1924) which set the precedent for open field cases and interprets that case to imply that an individual may not legitimately demand privacy for activities conducted out of doors in fields, except in the area immediately surrounding the home. The patch of marijuana being no where near the Oliver home, and in an open field, regardless of its visibility from public access, left the court affirming Oliver v. United States, and reversing the case of Thornton v. Maine, and in subject matter reaffirming that

Fourth Amendment Exceptions :: essays research papers

The Fourth Amendment to the Constitution states that people have the right to be secure in their somebodys, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable waites and seizures, but the fall out at hand here is whether this also applies to the searches of open palm and of objects in plain view and whether the fourth amendment provides protection over these as well. In bless to reaffirm the courts decision on this matter I will be relating their decisions in the cases of Oliver v. unify States (1984), and California v. Greenwood (1988) which deal directly with the question of whether a person can have reasonable expectations of privacy as provided for in the fourth amendment with regards to objects in an open field or in plain view. The differentiation amid open field and private property must be made before one can proceed to form an opinion regarding the constitutionality of a warrantless search of an open field. Oliver v. United States is a case in which police officers, ac ting on reports from neighbors that a patch of marijuana was being cultivated on the Oliver farm, entered on to private property ignoring No Trespassing signs, and on to a secluded open portion of the Oliver property without a warrant, discovered the marijuana patch and thus arrested Oliver without an arrest warrant. The Maine Judicial Court held that No Trespassing signs posted around the Oliver property evinced a reasonable expectation of privacy, and therefore the court held that the open fields doctrine was not applicable to the Oliver case. Upon hearing the case, the Supreme Court argues that the special protections accorded by the fourth amendment do not extend to open fields. Open fields do not provide the setting for those intimate activities that the Amendment is intended to shelter from government interference or surveillance. The court refers to the case of Hester v. United States (1924) which set the common law for open field cases and interprets that case to imply tha t an individual may not legitimately demand privacy for activities conducted out of doors in fields, except in the plain immediately surrounding the home. The patch of marijuana being no where near the Oliver home, and in an open field, regardless of its visibility from public access, left the court affirming Oliver v. United States, and reversing the case of Thornton v. Maine, and in essence reaffirming that